Hi helene this is not a question quarrels. I'm over that since some moment now. This is a question of removing/cleaning/organizing. So we will remove softSqueak and package it and save into the PharoTheme project so that people can load it if they want. I would like to get some beautiful looks that look like today standard.
Stef On Mar 29, 2011, at 8:32 PM, Helene Bilbo wrote: > > "Stéphane Ducasse“ wrote: >> >> I would really like to remove the standard squeak because it is terrible. >> I set it up since some updates and >> I cannot work with it anymore. >> > > No, it is not terrible. It is very beautiful, and much more useful and > innovative than for example fake-windows or fake-macos themes. > People like me who came to Pharo after you forked from Squeak have no idea > of your quarrels with the Squeak-Community (i only read it afterwards in the > mailing-lists) and have therefore no problem with using the best from every > implementation (the beautiful theme from squeak and the random refactorings > from pharo ;) > And while i would have no problem with loading the theme by hand — if i > would remove themes it would not be the squeak theme.. > > Have a look at: > http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/17/princeton-study-shows-that-easy-fonts-make-things-harder-to-reme/ > Princeton study shows that easy fonts make things harder to remember: > "Fortune favors the bold (and the Italicized)" > > -- > View this message in context: > http://forum.world.st/who-is-using-softSqueak-and-standard-Squeak-tp3407241p3415787.html > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
