On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 6:46 PM, Marcus Denker <[email protected]>wrote:
> > On Apr 4, 2011, at 6:36 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: > > > > On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 5:33 PM, Marcus Denker <[email protected]>wrote: > >> >> On Apr 4, 2011, at 4:58 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: >> >> > I started to try to release 1.2. Not only I did the list of changes but >> also: >> > >> > 1) I asked if people still wanted the background: >> http://forum.world.st/Do-you-want-to-add-the-background-picture-to-the-image-like-we-did-with-Pharo-1-1-td3350726.html#a3355332 >> > results: negative. So, no backgrund. White as it is now. >> > >> > 2) I asked what people wanted that used to be in 1.1: >> http://forum.world.st/Do-we-want-this-for-Pharo-1-2-and-futures-td3350721.html >> > guess how many replies? TWO. >> > results: I would only nclude the installScript. I guess that Hudson >> could do that very easy, doesn't it ? marcus ? >> > >> >> >> https://pharo-ic.lille.inria.fr/hudson/job/Pharo%201.2/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/Pharo-1.2/Pharo-1.2.st >> >> > Excellent! and that be included in the zip that hudson creates for the dev > images? > > > It used to be in there. But then people where thinking that it is a startup > file that is executed when the image starts up... maybe by renaming it this > would get clearer? > > ok, I understand. So yes, or a better name or...... if someone really needs to know that the build script was, then it means: 1) that he is aware of PharoCore / PharoDev 2) That he wants to reproduce the build, or fix a bug, or something. For me, both thins means that such guy is not a beginner/newbie. So we can assume that he also knows where to search such file in hudson ? if true...then we don't include the file... > > Marcus > > > -- > Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de > INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD. > > -- Mariano http://marianopeck.wordpress.com
