On Apr 5, 2011, at 3:00 AM, Hernán Morales Durand wrote: > Please someone clarify, are you going to kill the core? > > Honestly I don't know how people survive with the dev image, I guess > you have super fast laptops.
But you can unload packages. > > Not my case, and the Core just run nice in "old" hardware. > > 2011/4/4 Germán Arduino <[email protected]>: >> As I can understand the proposal of Marcus is not have anymore an >> image without the minimal set of tools for development. And I full >> agree with this option. >> >> Allways is possible to shrink the image in a next step if needed. In >> other words, to me Core is not useful witthout a minimal set of dev >> tools and I'm doing production deployments with such tools with no >> problems. By other hand, as most of the images are in remote servers I >> need to use them via VNC and with the dev tools. >> >> Just my opinion. >> >> Cheers. >> >> >> 2011/4/4 Tudor Girba <[email protected]>: >>> This is what I understood from what Marcus said, too :) >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Doru >>> >>> >>> On 4 Apr 2011, at 15:57, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: >>> >>>> This is my ideas. >>>> >>>>> My proposition for 1.3: >>>>> 1) Add MetacelloBrowser and switch to version-separated repositories >>>>> (like MetaRepoForPharo11, etc. -I don't like the "abbreviated names" but >>>>> you get the idea) >>>>> 2) Reduce the "full" image to >>>>> Core+OB+RB+Shout+OCompletion+Finder+MetacelloBrowser >>>>> 3) If it is possible, develop Core image into this reduced full image. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> www.tudorgirba.com >>> >>> "Every thing should have the right to be different." >>> >> >> > > > > -- > Hernán Morales > Information Technology Manager, > Institute of Veterinary Genetics. > National Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET). > La Plata (1900), Buenos Aires, Argentina. > Telephone: +54 (0221) 421-1799. > Internal: 422 > Fax: 425-7980 or 421-1799. >
