Comment #3 on issue 3966 by [email protected]: String>>lines misses tests
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3966
There could also be a test with mixed conventions because it is a feature of #lines
Comment #3 on issue 3966 by [email protected]: String>>lines misses tests
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3966
There could also be a test with mixed conventions because it is a feature of #lines