On Apr 13, 2011, at 9:32 AM, Philippe Marschall wrote:
> On 04/13/2011 09:00 AM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
>> I really interested to see if pharo would run on a JVM.
>
> Probably not. I mean you all the code relying on primitives, all the
> code relying on ByteString having the same memory layout as ByteArray,
> all the code relying on the scheduler being non-preemptive, all the
> code relying on #become: and so forth.
>
And does anyone really want a smalltalk without become: ?
And how do they do the thisContext magic?
Marcus
--
Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de
INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.
