On 2011-04-13, at 18:55, Miguel Cobá wrote: > El mié, 13-04-2011 a las 14:52 +0200, Camillo Bruni escribió: > >> And as Mariano pointed out, there should be a convention on the >> naming: I am still not sure about suffixing the exception classes with >> "Exception", but I guess this is a good thing to do. Though I must say >> that I omitted it so far ;) and just put the verb there, but that can >> be easily changed. > > I would say no to suffixes. Analogous to announcements, they shouldn't > have the suffix. The name should be descriptive enough and intention > revealing that the suffix isn't needed in most cases. For example, I > think that > > DividedByZero > > is better than > > DividedByZeroException > > and no information is lost with the sorter name. Instead, DivideByZero > isn't clear enough to indicate that is a event that happened. > > What do you think?
If this has been applied in the same sense before and its not a big deal I would prefer no suffixes as well. camillo
