On 22 April 2011 06:24, <[email protected]> wrote:
> I disagree strongly. . . The transcript should maintain its purpose that is
> to show information 'intentionally' written to by the programmer.
>
and so, what if my intent is to show error stack trace on transcript?
in headless mode i would prefer to log everything to some default
logging facility.. guess which one? yes, it is Transcript.
But then also i may want to use different stream for transcript in
headless mode (to redirect output to stdout or file), but that won't
require changing the error logging,
which could simply output everything to Transcript.
> If we feel the debugger info should be saved in some other place we should
> consider an alternate way of saving it, including, perhaps a log file and a
> {radio}button in the debugger itself.
>
> My 0.19999999.....
>
>
> Em 21/04/2011 15:19, Guillermo Polito < [email protected] > escreveu:
> It should be fine to have stack traces into the Transcript as a default
> behavior in addition to the debugger.
>
> Guille :)
>
>
>
--
Best regards,
Igor Stasenko AKA sig.
