ok
I was not aware that the semantics was what I was looking for.... the comment
is so good also.
removeSubscriber: subscriber
^ self protected: [
subscriptions removeAllSuchThat: [:subscription | subscription
subscriber == subscriber ]]
On Apr 24, 2011, at 11:02 AM, Denis Kudriashov wrote:
> Why #unregister: is not enough?
>
> 2011/4/24 Stéphane Ducasse <[email protected]>
> Yes
>
> Now is there a way that we could make sure that an object is really
> unregistered?
> I would write
>
> [ann hasSubscriber: anObject] whileTrue: [an unregister: anObject]
> in the client code
> but having
>
> fullyUnregister: anObject
>
> is good to have in special case.
>
> Stef
>
>
> > Okay. But i would discourage from using such methods :)
> >
> >> Stef
> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Best regards,
> >>> Igor Stasenko AKA sig.
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> > Igor Stasenko AKA sig.
> >
>
>
>
