Hi!
I worked on a small prototype to help me write code documentation.
As an example, here is a template that is automatically given for MOShape, an
abstract class in Mondrian that does not have any class variables. MOShape has
just one instance variable, isCached.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
'MOShape is PLEASE FILL
MOShape is an abstract class. The following methods needs to be implemented
#absoluteBoundsFor: #containsPoint:for: #display:on:
#heightFor: #widthFor:
Class collaborations
MOFilledShape MORoundedRectangleShape MOEvent MOLineShape
MOAbstractLineLayout MOHorizontalLineLayout MOShape MOVerticalLineLayout MONode
MOMouseEvent MOFormsShape MOImageShape MOEasel MOViewRenderer MOShapeAdaptor
MOGraphElement MOFormsBuilder MOBoundedShape MOChildrenShape MONodeShape
Testing classes
MOViewRendererTest MondrianTest MOFormsBuilderTest
MONewFormsBuilderTest
Class public API
#absoluteBoundsFor: #apply:bounds: #boundsFor:
#canHandleChildren #collectAllShapes #computeBoundsFor:
#computeExtentFor: #containsPoint:for: #disableCache #display:on:
#enableCache #heightFor: #isCached #isChildShape #isFormsShape
#isLineShape #isNodeShape #isShape #scaleElement:by:
Implementation notes
Instance Variables:
isCached -- PLEASE FILL
Comments written by AlexandreBergel on 25 April 2011
'
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
I plan to use this template for each class of Mondrian.
The template can be easily automatically processed to detect inconsistency.
A collaboration class is a class for which I sent to or received a message
from. Unit tests are excluded.
A public method is a method that is invoked by an instance of a different
class. This is very Java specific, I know. We could scope it to an object
instead of a class.
What is your opinion on this template?
Cheers,
Alexandre
On 25 Apr 2011, at 11:59, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
> I see your point. We need to iterate on what a good template can be.
>
> In general, I believe a lot can be extracted from unit test execution that
> can serve as a good basis for documentation: public, private methods,
> collaboration, ...
>
> Alexandre
>
>
> On 25 Apr 2011, at 03:15, Lukas Renggli wrote:
>
>> Hi Alexandre,
>>
>>> But this is not incompatible. The IVs may still be listed,
>>> the template can be adjusted for that
>>
>> Yes, this is true and the proposed change takes the IVs into account.
>> The only problem is that I have to scroll to the bottom in 90% of the
>> cases as the variables are a couple of pages below the template text.
>> 90% of the time I am looking for information and then something like
>> the variable types is at least useful, a two page template is only
>> "useful" the few times I actually write a comment.
>>
>> Lukas
>>
>> --
>> Lukas Renggli
>> www.lukas-renggli.ch
>>
>
> --
> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
>
>
>
>
>
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
