Also, images can get corrupted, crash, etc. 2011/5/4 Miguel Cobá <[email protected]>
> The difference is that saving the whole image is a longer operation that > just saving a couple records when they are directed to do so. In a image > with little activity this difference can be almost null but in a heavy > accessed image with a lot of data being created, the difference in times > is notorious. > Also, the image save is blocking AFAIK and during image saving the > responsiveness is greatly diminished. > > Cheers > > El mié, 04-05-2011 a las 04:36 -0700, Jeff Gray escribió: > > Kind of on topic as you're talking about sandstone....Since all records > are > > loaded at start up, is there an advantage of using sandstonedb for > > persistence over just saving the image? > > > > -- > > View this message in context: > http://forum.world.st/Re-Pharocast-ContactManager-using-SandstoneDb-tp3493449p3495214.html > > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > -- > Miguel Cobá > http://twitter.com/MiguelCobaMtz > http://miguel.leugim.com.mx > > > > >
