Thanks Cédrick. May be the right comment is:
See URI ? Laurent. On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 2:11 PM, Cédrick Béler <[email protected]> wrote: > part taken from URI class comment: > > "A hierarchical URI is either an absolute URI whose scheme-specific part > begins with a slash character, or a relative URI, that is, a URI that does > not specify a scheme. Some examples of hierarchical URIs are: > > http://www.pharo-project.org/home > file:///~/calendar > > A hierarchical URI is subject to further parsing according to the syntax > [scheme:][//authority][path][?query][#fragment] > where the characters :, /, ?, and # stand for themselves. The > scheme-specific part of a hierarchical URI consists of the characters > between the scheme and fragment parts. > > The authority part of a hierarchical URI is, if specified, either > server-based or registry-based. A server-based authority parses according to > the syntax > [user-info@]host[:port] > where the characters @ and : stand for themselves. Nearly all URI schemes > currently in use are server-based. An authority part that does not parse in > this way is considered to be registry-based. > > The path component of a hierarchical URI is itself said to be absolute if > it begins with a slash character ('/'); otherwise it is relative. The path > of a hierarchical URI that is either absolute or specifies an authority is > always absolute." > > > Le 4 mai 2011 à 21:20, laurent laffont a écrit : > > Today: HierarchicalURI > > > Comment Of The Day Contest - One Day One Comment > Rules: > #1: Each day a not commented class is elected. Each day the best comment > will be integrated with name of the author(s). > #2: If you cannot comment it, deprecate it. > Results: http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/CommentOfTheDayContest > > Laurent > > >
