Randall what is the position of squeak regarding the inclusion of qwak code in squeak?
Stef On May 12, 2011, at 3:11 AM, Randal L. Schwartz wrote: > > A question recently came up on the squeak-dev mailing list about the > legality of including GPL code in Squeak core, as to where the line > might be. This is especially interesting because of the OpenQwaq > release recently. > > I was able to answer the question for Squeak core definitively by saying > "if you have questions, Squeak is part of the SFC, so we have legal > representation through the SFLC". This permits potential contributors > to get free legal advice about whether their code would be permitted > into Squeak core without violating the Apache/MIT license. > > Which got me wondering, for Pharo, what's the equivalent? Have you guys > retained a lawyer or other arrangements for which you can sort out > license issues? Who is the "SFLC" equivalent for Pharo? > > -- > Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 > <[email protected]> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/> > Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. > See http://methodsandmessages.posterous.com/ for Smalltalk discussion >
