On 12 May 2011, at 17:58, Rob Withers wrote: > Sure. I cannot recall if I offered a stream interface or not. > I could add one and we could treat this and the SqueakSSL stream as provider > impl to a wrapper stream.
The code that I am working on has a good [Secure]SocketStream implementation, it depends on a Socket like object, and on an SSLSession, which currently is the plugin. I imagine that it could also be your code. > I'll comment more as I dig into it. I think I will fork a PharoSSL project, > since I know of at least one change in there. If I understood correctly, you need all of Cryptography, right ? So would it not make more sense to (if necessary), start or add a Cryptography-Pharo ? I mean, your code is much more than SSL. Sven
