On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 12:28 AM, Marcus Denker <[email protected]>wrote:
> > On May 19, 2011, at 9:16 AM, Igor Stasenko wrote: > > > On 19 May 2011 08:43, Torsten Bergmann <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Marcus wrote > >>> This situation with the thousands of different VMs is *impossible*. We > need >to fix that. > >> > >> If on Windows you should really use the installer for Pharo 1.2.2. > >> from the download page. This will give you the two VM's: standard and > Cog > >> and you can use them to start all images from your HD. > >> > >> Since both have a different icon (also for the Pharo window) > >> you always know which one you start/running on. > >> > >> Just give it a try, its simple. > >> > >> Since the Pharo.exe and PharoCog.exe also have the version number > >> in the resource section you can right click on it in explorer > >> and check which code version/revision they have (see attached > screenshot). > >> > > > > Torsten, can you please document somewhere, how you chaging the version > info? > > I really can't understand how today's VMs are versioned, and what > > version we could use for Pharo-branded VMs. > > Probably with 'P' suffix? > > *PLEASE* do not take the version numbering that is now in the Squeak VM. > Nobody understands why there is a Version 5 MacVM. Version 5? Squeak is at > Verison 4, Pharo at 1. > +1. > > We *neeeeeeed* for every version of Pharo a VM that has *just* the same > version number. > > Pharo 1.3 uses VM 1.3. 1.4 uses VM 1.4 > > Marcus > > -- > Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de > INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD. > > >
