On May 20, 2011, at 10:08 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: > Stef, > > On 20 May 2011, at 08:57, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: > >> Hi Sven >> >> with igor we went over the start up list and we saw that ZnServer resgiter >> all subclasses of ZnServer. >> We think that it would be better to have a list of servers to be registered >> and that users can decide. >> What do you think? >> >> Stef > > It is the traditional/classic idea that a server object in Smalltalk should > survive image save/load. This is very convenient for beginners and during > development. For production systems, explicit control is better. > > Now that I look at the code again, I must agree that it is a bit weird: only > those server registered/started as the default in their class fall under this > scheme, not other instances. > > So yes, an explicit managed list of ZnServer subclasses that need > startup/shutdown would be nicer. If that is what you mean.
Yes :) > > Sven > >
