> I don't know how to reproduce the situation in the screenshot, but I have a > small idea of what the problem is: > Your package Spy is composed of several subcategories. All the classes are > defined in the subcategories but none is defined in the one called 'Spy'.
All Spy classes are defined in a category Spy-XXX > In Rpackage, the classes are put inside the RPackage matching the category in > which the class is defined What does it mean? How comes that the package Spy was created? Where does it come from? I just took a fresh 1.3 one click, downloaded Nautilus then Spy. Spy appear as one single package called 'Spy'. No idea where it comes from. Alexandre > > 2011/5/19 Alexandre Bergel <[email protected]> > Thanks for making it happen :-) > > Alexandre > > > On 19 May 2011, at 15:39, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: > > > thanks for reporting it. > > > > do you have a reproducable way of arriving to this state? > > > >> Hi ! > >> > >> I think I bumped into a bug when using Nautilus. I am not sure whether > >> this is due to RPackage or not. > >> > >> I loaded Spy, and apparently there is no class in the package within > >> Nautilus. > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Alexandre > >> -- > >> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: > >> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu > >> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> <Screen shot 2011-05-19 at 11.21.23.png> > > > > > > -- > _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: > Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu > ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. > > > > > > > -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
