Marcus Denker-4 wrote: > > Yes, the IT services provide infrastructure that creates Jenkins setups. > E.g. we can > request one for RMOD, and there will be one for Rmod. > > Yes, we could request them to extend this meta-setup it with changing the > look. But the thing is that > this *We* can not do, but the admines would need to do it. And it would be > work to provide > a UI for uploading images, checking they are good... >
Provide a UI for uploading images? Say what? Marcus Denker-4 wrote: > > And my feeling is that they have other things that are more important to > do (the whole > setup is in test mode...) > > Especially we should *use* it before running back and requesting even more > changes. > (and unimportant ones, especially)... > > It's just not a good idea to do that now. > > Marcus > Look-and-feel has historically always come in second (except at companies like Apple, even when they were a small) and developers have always defended the *use* first before *look-n-feel* ... I reckon its bs! The 3 images attached are exactly the same size and even have the same name for crying out loud. How hard is it really to replace 3 resource images? Anyhow, it was just a suggestion do with them what you want :) -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Hudson-Jenkins-tp3538245p3541725.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
