Em 30-05-2011 17:23, Marcus Denker escreveu: > On May 30, 2011, at 9:59 PM, Casimiro de Almeida Barreto wrote: > >> Regarding this subject I think: >> >> • There's impossible to authoritatively classify anything as "dead >> code" unless there's a reference standard of what's core and what's not core >> (like, Java defines the JFCs). At this point it would be useful to have a >> reference standard of "core classes" and their "core messages/methods". >> > We do not have such a reference. I do not know how you can build one without > cleaning up. > > Marcus In my mind such a cycle would be something like:
freeze -> clean up & debug -> map dependencies -> orthogonalize -> define core & extras -> implement control mechanisms to avoid "contamination/degradation" of core stuff -> document CdAB > > -- > Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de > INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD. > > >
