David T. Lewis wrote:
> 
> If I remember correctly, there are no plans for further updates
> to that VM (Esteban could say better than me of course).
> 

From
http://forum.world.st/looking-for-feedback-on-Cocoa-Cog-MT-VM-td3534230.html
:

Esteban Lorenzano wrote:
> 
> What is definitively true, is the fact that there are a lot of machines
> who needs to use a 4.x series (in mac versions), and a lot of legacy code
> who will be using this "old" vm too... and because of this, 4.x series
> will be around a long time. 
> 

With Cog 5.8b12, I got warnings like "process accessor module not
available".

And I mentioned the hanging tests with the Cocoa 5.7.4.1 in my last post.

So there seems to be issues with all the Mac VMs.


David T. Lewis wrote:
>  If it I can raise the question on the vm-dev list.
Done.

--
View this message in context: 
http://forum.world.st/OSProcess-on-1-2-tp3569458p3573880.html
Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Reply via email to