On 13.07.2011 07:21, John Toohey wrote: > Maybe "enterprise" is the wrong word. I have a system with multiple > servers, some in Java, some in Clojure, and the Console servers > developed in Seaside running on Pharo. I need to have all these > servers talk to each other, and today I'm using JMS over ActiveMQ to > do that. I need to use Stomp as a protocol to allow my Console > servers to push data updates to the main servers, and its fragile.
What does to wrong? What are the problems you are seeing? Do you have trouble with the clients or the message broker? > It > could be that my implementation is wrong, and you could advise on > that. What is your experience in pushing messages from Smalltalk VMs > to Java and C servers? Any help would be most appreciated. (My systems > supports 200 end to end transactions per seconds, with many thousand > concurrent transactions. It's deployed on 16 servers in an EC2 cloud) > > Why would ZeroMq be better? I have 20 year experience writing network > servers, and to honest, I'm not even sure where to start with an > answer to that question. Again, if you could help me out here, it > would be most appreciated. Perhaps, your experience in developing > large scale network applications, would be insightful here. No, sorry, I was just curious and trying to better understand your problem because normally I would associate ActiveMQ with "enterprise" and not ZeroMQ. Cheers Philippe
