Denis Kudriashov wrote: > > I think not. > This way is substitution of method literal. > > But "self sends" stubbing required anonimous subclass creation with > required > methods overrides. >
That sounds right. The bytecodes would be different if a self send was rerouted to another object (pushLit: instead of self). Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Stubbing-class-side-methods-tp3674065p3678562.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
