thanks ;)
On 2011-07-19, at 17:23, Lukas Renggli wrote: > Some Smalltalks required it (i.e. VA), that's probably also the reason > why SUnit uses it. Likely has to do with how they implement exception > handlers. > > Lukas > > On Tuesday, 19 July 2011, Camillo Bruni <[email protected]> wrote: >> Can anyone explain me why it would make sense to use #return: in the >> following method? >> >> TestCase >> executeShould: aBlock inScopeOf: anExceptionalEvent >> ^[aBlock value. >> false] >> on: anExceptionalEvent >> do: [:ex | ex return: true] >> >> I would instinctively replace [:ex | ex return: true] with the much simpler >> [:ex | ^ true].. >> Am I missing something here? >> >> camillo >> >> > > -- > Lukas Renggli > www.lukas-renggli.ch >
