Am 22.07.2011 um 22:15 schrieb Stéphane Ducasse: >>> >> I don't know. But I think Hillaire had a point in here. > > what point? > We want to change and rewrite all the tools. Now we can only do that with > people working. > Now we remove the inheritance class browser. and now if you want to see the > implementor of add: then you do not use inheritance anymore. > You should use implementors or you help in nautilus and rpackage because > nautilus implement inheritance. > >> There is a change rate a community can cover. As we like to change code it >> is ok that things break. If complaints about broken things raise than you >> should see that you overstretched your capability and need to think again. > > Yes but I do not think that we are in this situation.
Ok. > The point is to consider the ratio of changes vs bugs. Well, that's what I'm saying. > I can pay Igor one and half year after igor may be forced to sell his PHP > skills again :(. > So we can go slowly and play cards and watch videos, but this means that less > will be done. > > Or we break some stuff from time to time and this is ok and we move at the > speed we believe is good. > Right now I'm not even working a day a week on Pharo but if I would work more > I would not catch more bugs because > these "bugs" are stuff that I never use. So if people use different scenario > than us, how can we know it without them raising > problems? > Thanks Stef for always answering verbose :) I can see that you have more typical kind of project management problems combined with a community. I don't want to talk against anything. In the last weeks I just heard a lot of complaints from some "more core" developers about complaints from others "not so core". And I can't see much sense in "complaining about complaining". That's all. Norbert > > Stef > >> The type of replies I replied to just prove that someone is tired listening. >> And at least I'm pretty sure that listening is essential. >> >> Norbert > >
