On Jul 25, 2011, at 6:08 PM, Gary Chambers wrote: > I did check. Having a single accessor (with mutation) does not cover all the > cases. Some users require *no* getter, for instance, so would be erroneous to > update in response to a change.
Ok I finally got it :) we are open to change :) our goal was to clean the ugly "ok let us compile a method on the fly" Stef > > Regards, Gary > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stéphane Ducasse" > <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Monday, July 25, 2011 4:36 PM > Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] [update 1.4] #14057 > > > Did you check what we did? > Because it would give us some confidence :) > > Stef > > On Jul 25, 2011, at 4:21 PM, Gary Chambers wrote: > >> Some trickyness. >> >> Use of a combined accessor vs. separate get/set selectors may cause some >> problems since less flexible. >> Users exist in Slider subclasses and DiffMorph. Plus the TEasilyThemed and >> UITheme helpers. >> >> Regards, Gary >> >> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stéphane Ducasse" >> <[email protected]> >> To: "pharo-project open-source Smalltalk" >> <[email protected]> >> Sent: Friday, July 22, 2011 6:31 PM >> Subject: [Pharo-project] [update 1.4] #14057 >> >> >> 14057 >> ----- >> >> - Issue 4513: ScrollBar and MorphicModel needs cleaning. Stef and Igor >> killing tha big monster - Part two. :) >> http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=4513 >> >> Gary it would be good that you check because we have two ways to to a >> perform: accessor and setValueSelector while only one would be enough. >> >> Stef and Igor >> > > >
