Tudor Girba-2 wrote: > > I think this is Pharo specific. Is it Ok to commit such changes, or is the > code meant to work in Squeak as well (in which case, we should fork it for > Pharo)? >
To keep it as simple and widely available as possible, why don't we use the power of Metacello, and break it into Core and Platform sub-packages, making the "Smalltalk os platformName" call in a helper extension method (*Platform). This way the code will be in one place (no fork) and compatible with Pharo and Squeak. Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Downloading-1-4-tp3696454p3699183.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
