Thanks for the suggestion. I don't know yet how it would fit with SmalltalkHub, and how to integrate it, but it could be a nice addition indeed.
Cheers, Nico 2011/8/4 Torsten Bergmann <[email protected]> > Serge wrote > >Very similar to forks in github: if you have no access to a project or > >the project seems stalled, you fork the project ans apply your own > >patches. > > But with one difference: a fork means really forking (the whole) codebase > and this fork is usually available at a different location. > You can (and have to) completely maintain this fork then. This could > be good or bad. The more forks exist the more people can be confused... > > > But an projects "Inbox" would be bound to the project - so project > developers/admins could decide which "inbox" contribution to accept > and integrate into the code base. People who provide good contributions > could later be added as project developers and even when a contribution is > not integrated it is close to the project for others to use. > > Currently we do something similar with Pharo and PharoInbox - but they > are two separate projects in SqS. A default "Inbox" for any project > would IMHO a nice addition. > > Bye > T. > > > -- > Empfehlen Sie GMX DSL Ihren Freunden und Bekannten und wir > belohnen Sie mit bis zu 50,- Euro! https://freundschaftswerbung.gmx.de > >
