Meaning that anything ripped out of Sophie 1.0 should be (or is, rather) covered by an MIT licence, rather than Sophie 2.0's licence. Which is a good thing!
frank ----- Original Message ----- From: Johannes Rasche <[email protected]> Sent: 16 August 2011 14:17 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] Quicktime and MP3 harvested from Sophie meaning ? Am 16.08.2011 um 13:49 schrieb Frank Shearar: > Surely the Smalltalk part's covered by _this_ licence? > > http://www.futureofthebook.org/sophie/about/license/ > > As opposed to the licence for Sophie 2.0. > > frank > > On 16 August 2011 12:45, Johannes Rasche <[email protected]> wrote: >> as you may know Sophie project is now rewritten in Java >> the license is: http://www.sophie2.org/users/licensing.html >> I would ask them, whether the same conditions apply for the Smalltalk code >> >> Am 16.08.2011 um 12:24 schrieb Marcus Denker: >> >> On Aug 16, 2011, at 11:02 AM, Johannes Rasche wrote: >> >> Hi all, especially Sean >> >> assume my recent posting has been overseen, therefore again: >> >> I'm referring to Sean's harvesting of Sophie. >> >> Is somebody going to finalize this Quicktime harvesting ? >> >> >> What is the license? >> >> -- >> Marcus Denker -- http://marcusdenker.de >> >> >> >> >
