Hi Sean! Phexample doesn't duplicate the logic of what is a change method, it changes it. The rational is to allow the user to choose a speaking test name, that accurately describes the test:
shouldNicelyHandleNotifications And the like. Is this really in conflict with OB? Niko On 24.06.2011, at 21:01, Sean P. DeNigris wrote: > You can now have Phexample playing nicely with OB and Autotest... > * Autotest - I uploaded a new package (Autotest-Core-SeanDeNigris.5) that > will pick up Phexample and any other framework that defines tests > differently (it uses the class's #allTestSelectors method). > * OB - I uploaded a slice to the Pharo inbox that does the same for OB > (SLICE-Issue-4449-Feature-OB-can-handle-arbitrarily-defined-test-selectors-SeanDeNigris.1). > > All it took was removing some duplication in the system - TestCase, > Autotest, and OB were all repeating the "what is a test method" logic. > > HTH, > Sean > > -- > View this message in context: > http://forum.world.st/Phexample-integrated-with-Autotest-and-OB-was-ConfigurationOfPhexample-was-assert-equals-feels-backw-tp3623325p3623325.html > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > -- http://scg.unibe.ch/staff/Schwarz twitter.com/nes1983 Tel: +41786126354
