Doru,

When 3.0.5 was released Pharo1.2 support was just added and AFAIK Pharo1.3 was 
not ... there has been work on Seaside since then and talk of 3.0.6 ... I was 
planning on doing some configuration maintenance as part of the Seaside sprint 
after ESUG ... no time to spare before:)

Dale

----- Original Message -----
| From: "Tudor Girba" <[email protected]>
| To: [email protected]
| Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2011 11:34:54 AM
| Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] [Seaside] seaside #stable on pharo.13?
| 
| Hi,
| 
| Dale, as the main maintainer of the configuration, would you be
| available to give a hand with this?
| 
| Cheers,
| Doru
| 
| 
| On 16 Aug 2011, at 13:10, Lukas Renggli wrote:
| 
| > All the latest packages work well in Pharo 1.3, especially in
| > combination with Zinc (so the dependency to Kom could be removed).
| > 
| > Lukas
| > 
| > On Tuesday, 16 August 2011, Marcus Denker <[email protected]>
| > wrote:
| > >
| > > On Aug 16, 2011, at 12:18 PM, Tudor Girba wrote:
| > >
| > >> Hi,
| > >>
| > >> The ConfiguraitonOfSeaside does not define any #stable version
| > >> for Pharo 1.3.
| > >>
| > >> Is it intentional or is it simply because the configuration is
| > >> not up to date?
| > >
| > >
| > > The configuration is not up to date... would be nice to fix it.
| > > And it would be good
| > > to have a version that loads a minimal seaside (no OB, which I
| > > think this does).
| > >
| > > --
| > > Marcus Denker -- http://marcusdenker.de
| > >
| > >
| > >
| > 
| > --
| > Lukas Renggli
| > www.lukas-renggli.ch
| 
| --
| www.tudorgirba.com
| 
| "Problem solving should be focused on describing
| the problem in a way that makes the solution obvious."
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 

Reply via email to