On 17 August 2011 08:59, Max Leske <[email protected]> wrote: > Some people seem to have adopted MetacelloRepository as the standard > repository for all configurations, others keep the configuration for a > project in the project repositories and a third group uses both repositories > (where one repository contains outdated versions of course…).
The MetacelloConfiguration belongs to the project and is under responsibility of the developers, so one should be in the project's repo. MetacelloRepository is the central well-known place, so maybe only versions with a stable release really need to be there? There will be other well-known places, the idea is to have a curated one for each version of Pharo I believe. In any case, maybe part of this should be docuplemented into MetacelloToolBox ? (PS. toolbox is a proper english word, so that capital B in the class name is unnecessary :) -- Damien Pollet type less, do more [ | ] http://people.untyped.org/damien.pollet
