On 17 August 2011 14:23, Lukas Renggli <[email protected]> wrote: >>> What you think? >> >> How would that help anybody to find out whether they are relying on >> deprecated methods? This seems like a big step backwards form a user >> point of view. Suddenly a method is gone and you didn't get a warning. >> You are you supposed to check for deprecated methods? Debug each and >> every one of your message sends? > > +1, such an annotation is totally counterproductive. >
Provide an alternative. Imagine that we're want to deprecate Array>>at: what is possible solution? Because we need to have some way to deal with deprecation things like that, not only stuff which used sparingly. > Lukas > > -- > Lukas Renggli > www.lukas-renggli.ch > > -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko AKA sig.
