On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 8:40 AM, Marcus Denker <[email protected]>wrote:
> > On Aug 18, 2011, at 1:16 AM, Craig Latta wrote: > > > > >> Do I hear "remote tools" ? > > > > How would that work, exactly? Wouldn't you want to keep the > > contexts where they are, and interact with them with remote messages? > > Otherwise, it seems like differences between the two object memories > > would cause trouble eventually. > > > Yes. For remote tools one wants to do it differently... > Mariano's experiment was just meant as a Demo to show Fuel serialization. > > Exactly. The same as the example with Riak. I am not saying that Fuel is able to do remove tools nor to be an excellent persistence solution. What I am DO saying is that with Fuel we want to be able to serialize whatever, contexts, closures, etc. And that allows further experiments and work. Fuel only takes care about the serialization infrastructure ;) With Riak all I wanted to show is that it is really easy to take a graph, serialize it with Fuel and store/retrieve it from a NoSQL database. > Marcus > > -- > Marcus Denker -- http://marcusdenker.de > > > -- Mariano http://marianopeck.wordpress.com
