On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Alexandre Bergel
<[email protected]>wrote:

> Indeed, refactorings for unit tests are completely absent from the software
> engineering community.
>


Oh, so you just have to invent it :)

Laurent.



>
> Alexandre
>
>
> On 19 Aug 2011, at 15:39, laurent laffont wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 3:23 PM, Alexandre Bergel <
> [email protected]> wrote:
> > Before leading a revolution, we can maybe have this work for unit test
> first :-)
> >
> > Actually, when I think about it, having not the setUp visible when
> writing tests make the setUp functionality mostly useless.
> >
> >
> > Also, I usually write the setUp to remove duplication, so often after the
> second test method. A refactoring "extract to setUp" would be cool too.
> >
> > Another point, when I have a hierarchy of TestCase I often feel I need a
> "merged setUp view"
> >
> > Laurent.
> >
> >
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Alexandre
> >
> >
> > On 19 Aug 2011, at 15:19, laurent laffont wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 3:09 PM, Alexandre Bergel <
> [email protected]> wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > I know there are many TDD shoguns around.
> > >
> > > I was wondering whether I am the only one suffering from the need to
> see the definition of setUp before writing a test method. Unfortunately,
> current tool does not automatically show the definition of setUp when I want
> to write a new test.
> > > The cost of seeing how the setUp is done is high: need to open a new
> window, clicking to restore the context on the first window, ...
> > >
> > > Am I the only one?
> > >
> > >
> > > No. I would like too.
> > >
> > > But not only for tests. I often need to look at several related methods
> at once while developing.
> > >
> > > Laurent.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Alexandre
> > > --
> > > _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
> > > Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
> > > ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
> > Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
> > ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
> Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to