2011/8/22 Stéphane Ducasse <[email protected]>:
> Nicolas
>
> From I understood this is a fix to fix another problem that conflicted with 
> some hidden logic.
> Apparently Squeaksource could save anempty file and you could not upload a 
> new version.
> So a fix "appeared" but it broke another aspect.
>
> Now clearly using an old image with an old vm with an old version of Seaside 
> and thousands
> of files and lukas leaving for google led to the fact that indeed the process 
> is not good.
> Shit happen. Now this is why we want SmalltalkHub and I hope that we will 
> have process to upgrade.
>
> Stef
>

Sure, we have the right to make mistakes. That's just the way to
announce it that would raise more questions than answers in the mind
of an annoying client like me ;) (to be polite)

Nicolas

>
>> Good news, but:
>>
>> 2011/8/22 Fabrizio Perin <[email protected]>:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> As most of you have experienced lately squeaksource have been behaving
>>> unreliably, loosing versions and crashing.
>>> We discovered that a changed introduced in March, which we were not aware
>>> of, was responsible for these inconveniences.
>>
>> This sentence is frightening. It does mean that the changes went out of 
>> control.
>> If it's really the case, it would be great to improve the process so
>> as to give more control on the changes.
>>
>> Nicolas
>>
>>> We fixed the issue and stabilied squeaksource.
>>>
>>> We would like to thank Philippe Marschall and Lukas Renggli for their help
>>> in fixing this problem.
>>>
>>> Squeaksource should be as stable and reliable as it has always been. If you
>>> find any other problem please do not hesitate to contact us.
>>>
>>> Fabrizio and Jorge
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>

Reply via email to