It is consistent so I don't care too much :D just curious ;)
On 2011-08-23, at 15:42, Lukas Renggli wrote: > Legacy, and because it really doesn't matter of how you name your > double-dispatch methods as long as you do it consistently within your > realm. > > Lukas > > On 23 August 2011 15:40, Tudor Girba <[email protected]> wrote: >> Indeed, this is really confusing :). I am not aware of any particular reason. >> >> Doru >> >> >> On 23 Aug 2011, at 15:33, Camillo Bruni wrote: >> >>> Hi everyone, >>> >>> I just had a quick look at the RBNodes. Is there a particular reason why >>> the visitor pattern methods are prefixed on both sides with 'accept'? >>> >>> eg. >>> >>> RBArrayNode >> acceptVisitor: aProgramNodeVisitor >>> ^ aProgramNodeVisitor acceptArrayNode: self >>> >>> camillo >> >> -- >> www.tudorgirba.com >> >> "There are no old things, there are only old ways of looking at them." >> >> >> >> >> > > > > -- > Lukas Renggli > www.lukas-renggli.ch >
