On 27 August 2011 14:59, Bert Freudenberg <[email protected]> wrote: > On 26.08.2011, at 18:14, Alexander Lazarević wrote: > > Hi Stef! > > 2011/8/26 Stéphane Ducasse <[email protected]> > > In Squeak alexander lazaverich did a SystemReporter. I wanted to have a look > but got distracted. > > It would be good to use it. > > Sure thing that I was just about to mention that it is on SqueakSource, when > there is no SqueakSource. :-/ > > Boy, this is annoying. > > The Chile mirror is up. > > To me it seems that the SqueakSource repo on source.squeak.org received some > more love in the past so that it seems to be more stable and responsive. > > While it seems more stable indeed, it also gets much less traffic. I'n not > sure it would handle the load of squeaksource.com as well. > > Just for practical reasons (a source repo that's not available over long > periods of time just suxx) I'm considering moving my few bits > to source.squeak.org until there is a reliable alternative. > > So far we have not opened up source.squeak.org for personal projects. > > Wouldn't it make also good sense to move some vital stuff like the vmmaker > repo to this destination? I know this will be controversial, but the current > situation is bad at best. > > That would be a good idea IMHO - you might ask what the other VM developers > think of the idea on the vm-dev list. >
I think this is good idea, especially if uploading VMMaker package won't take ages as currently is. There are some screwed logic on squeaksource. > I think the broken SqueakSource is hurting us more than we know! > > We discussed this at ESUG and so far the most promising plan is to migrate > squeaksource.com to a SqueakSource3 instance running on Gemstone. Tobias > should be able to tell us more. > - Bert - -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko AKA sig.
