On Aug 29, 2011, at 12:56 PM, Lukas Renggli wrote: > On 29 August 2011 09:29, Stéphane Ducasse <[email protected]> wrote: >> and we could keep all the Object method in a extension of the halt packages >> and just some of them as forward to Halt. >> >> I know that there was an attempt on the inbox to do that. But I was worried >> that people will complain. >> Now cleaning Object would be nice. > > Backward compatibility is good, but in this very case I would argue > against it. Code that has "self halt*" in it (and that is quite a > bit), is broken by definition. > >> why not >> Halt ifTrue: [a = 2]. > > The condition is in the argument, not the receiver. What you suggest > would be very confusing change to Boolean>>ifTrue: aBlock, I suspect > :-)
Yes I was getting out my bed and still sleeping. :) > > Lukas > > -- > Lukas Renggli > www.lukas-renggli.ch >
