On Aug 30, 2011, at 6:02 PM, Douglas Brebner wrote: > On 30/08/2011 13:30, Tudor Girba wrote: >> I proposed this some one or two years ago. I got shut down, but I still find >> it a good idea. >> >> And I even have a semantic reason: >> - A Block represents a piece of functionality that can be evaluated with >> some input >> - A Symbol often represents a selector which in turns represents a piece of >> functionality that can be evaluated with some input. >> > > I seem to recall there was discussion some time ago about splitting Selector > functionality from Symbol. After all, there's no real reason that a selector > has to be a Symbol.
It was just a stupid idea of mine :) > > Also, some of the examples in this thread seem to be about terseness for > terseness sake. >
