On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:26 PM, Dale Henrichs <[email protected]> wrote:

> Mariano,
>
> I think that addVersion: is very old gofer/metacello code ... not fancy new
> code. It sounds like an old version of Metacello is being
> loaded/bootstrapped. #addVersion: isn't sent from the current code base ...
> At a minimum, you should have these packages loaded:
>
>  'Metacello-Base-DaleHenrichs.19'
>  'Metacello-Core-DaleHenrichs.455'
>  'Metacello-MC-DaleHenrichs.505'
>
>
Wow. This is weird. The versions that are being loaded are:
Metacello-Core-dkh.302
Metacello-MC-dkh.258
...

So...terribly old.  Of course, the problem was that out #ensureMetacello was
very old. But how we didn't discovered before doing the release? of course,
because we used Pharo images that already come with Metacello hahahha.

I have just commited the fix. I took the latest #ensureMetacello from here:
http://code.google.com/p/metacello/wiki/EnsureMetacello
I hope this is correct.

Thanks Dale for the help and thanks Laszlo for the report!


> if the bootstrapping process is working.
>
> Keep in mind that pharo1.4.x has not yet been defined in Metacello (see
> Issue 4613[1]), so there will be other Metacello issues in 1.4 for the
> moment ... the proposed bugfix in 4613 would mean that a new version of
> Metacello would no longer be needed to define the platform specific
> attributes ...
>
> Dale
>
> [1] http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=4613
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> | From: "Mariano Martinez Peck" <[email protected]>
> | To: [email protected], "Pharo Development" <
> [email protected]>
> | Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2011 2:00:26 PM
> | Subject: [Pharo-project] Gofer/Metacello problem in 1.4 [WAS] Re: DBXTalk
>     and Pharo 1.4
> |
> |
> |
> |
> | On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 9:14 PM, Laszlo Zsolt Kiss <
> | [email protected] > wrote:
> |
> |
> |
> |
> | hi.
> | first i load the ConfigurationOfOpenDBX and the 1.4 version is
> | missing from the spec.:
> |
> |
> |
> | stable: spec
> | <symbolicVersion: #stable>
> |
> | spec for: #'pharo1.2.x' version: '1.0'.
> | spec for: #'pharo1.3.x' version: '1.0'.
> |
> |
> | then i added the next line to the spec:
> |
> |
> | spec for: #'pharo1.4.x' version: '1.0'.
> |
> |
> | then i probally do it this:
> |
> |
> | (((Smalltalk globals at: #ConfigurationOfOpenDBXDriver) perform:
> | #project) perform: #version: with: #stable) load.
> |
> |
> | i gived back a warring:
> |
> |
> |
> | "The method Gofer addVersion: has been deprecated.
> | Instead of #addVersion: simply use #version:
> |
> | Hi. Yes, I can reproduce this problem :(
> |
> |
> |
> |
> |
> |
> |
> |
> | Select Proceed to continue, or close this window to cancel the
> | operation."
> |
> |
> | I proceed this warrning.
> |
> |
> | Then gived back an error message, I think this error came from the
> | Metacello.
> |
> | I attached the PharoDebug file.
> |
> |
> |
> |
> | The error is in the method #updateProject where it does:
> |
> | (GoferPackageReference name: mgr packageName repository: mgr
> | repositoryGroup) versionReference.
> |
> | GoferPackageReference dnu #name:repository: instead, it is
> | implemented in GoferResolvedReference
> |
> |
> | Dale any idea?
> |
> | Versions: Gofer-Core-StephaneDucasse.135.
> | Metacello version is ...... ConfigurationOfMetacello project
> | currentVersion raises dnu #setName
> |
> | So...I guess Pharo 1.4 is using a very new version of Gofer, which
> | brings lot of changes that break Metacello ?
> |
> | Thanks!
> |
> |
> |
> |
> |
> |
> |
> |
> | Byte
> | Laszlo Zsolt
> |
> |
> | Ps: the image is clean #14112 and the CogVM is the last..
> |
> |
> | inez Peck < [email protected] >
> |
> |
> |
> |
> |
> |
> |
> |
> |
> | On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 9:53 AM, Laszlo Zsolt Kiss <
> | [email protected] > wrote:
> |
> |
> | Hi Developers!
> |
> |
> | Can I use any way this combination: DBXTalk with Pharo 1.4?
> |
> | Hi. Yes, sure. Did you try it? You shouldn't have any problem.
> | Please let us know if you do have.
> |
> |
> | --
> | Mariano
> | http://marianopeck.wordpress.com
> |
> |
> |
> |
> |
> | --
> | Mariano
> | http://marianopeck.wordpress.com
> |
> |
>
>


-- 
Mariano
http://marianopeck.wordpress.com

Reply via email to