On 2 September 2011 17:27, Philippe Marschall <[email protected]> wrote: > On 02.09.2011 15:39, Igor Stasenko wrote: >> Looks like it tries to destroy socket which were left from previous session, >> and of course fails because in newly started image the socket handle invalid. > > Sure, but that should signal #primitiveFailed, not segfault the vm. > according to log, there is a primitive fail. do you have a crash.dmp log?
> Cheers > Philippe > > > -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko AKA sig.
