Let us know if we need to reintroduce it. But what would be nice is to understand exactly what was used and for what. Because the startup was full of strange dependencies (Some of them were bogus) Stef
On Sep 5, 2011, at 6:55 PM, Gary Chambers wrote: > More specifically, we had Abstractlauncher subclasses... > > Regards, Gary > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Igor Stasenko" <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Monday, September 05, 2011 5:37 PM > Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] AutoStart, where are you? > > >> Yes, but why Autostart? >> why after, not before? >> Does it makes sense to declare an order (and as a consequence >> introducing a dependency), when there is no preference? >> >> On 5 September 2011 18:28, Gary Chambers <[email protected]> wrote: >>> I miss that too! (all our deployed apps used it) >>> >>> Regards, Gary >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sean P. DeNigris" >>> <[email protected]> >>> To: <[email protected]> >>> Sent: Monday, September 05, 2011 5:09 PM >>> Subject: [Pharo-project] AutoStart, where are you? >>> >>> >>>> This class was in 1.2, but is missing in 1.3. Why was it removed and what >>>> has >>>> replaced it? Also, is there a flaw in the deprecation system that has me >>>> ask >>>> these questions in the first place? >>>> >>>> I can't load XMLRPC because of: >>>> >>>> Smalltalk addToStartUpList: self after: AutoStart. >>>> >>>> What do I replace this with? >>>> >>>> Sean >>>> >>>> p.s. I found mentions in several issues and ml posts, but nothing >>>> definitive. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> View this message in context: >>>> http://forum.world.st/AutoStart-where-are-you-tp3791613p3791613.html >>>> Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Best regards, >> Igor Stasenko AKA sig. > >
