On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Igor Stasenko <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 13 September 2011 19:52, Alexandre Bergel <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi! > > > > Apparently, the following method is abstract: > > > > ArrayedCollection>>add: newObject > > self shouldNotImplement > > > > If I evaluate: > > (ArrayedCollection>>#add:) isAbstract => true > > > > This is not quite right. A method that is cancelled is not abstract. > > > > I propose to change > > CompiledMethod>>abstractMarkers > > ^ #(subclassResponsibility shouldNotImplement) > > > > into > > CompiledMethod>>abstractMarker > > ^ #shouldNotImplement > > > > Does it make sense? > > > > yes > Why? It doesn't for me. A method defined as ^ self subclassResponsibility is "abstract" from my point of view. > > > Cheers, > > Alexandre > > -- > > _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: > > Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu > > ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Best regards, > Igor Stasenko. > > -- Mariano http://marianopeck.wordpress.com
