Haha, but sometimes you can't decide :P On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Gary Chambers <[email protected]>wrote:
> ** > Having looked at the support for WSDL interpretation in Pharo/Squeak > recently we decided to go RESTful instead ;-) > For us we prefer to be more dynamic, not to say that a general WSDL-based > interface could not be done without creating new classes though. > > Regards, Gary > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Guillermo Polito <[email protected]> > *To:* [email protected] > *Sent:* Wednesday, September 28, 2011 6:23 PM > *Subject:* Re: [Pharo-project] Webservices (any update) > > I don't think so... (But I didn't use it in a real environment yet, so I > can be wrong :) ). I've only saved it in squeaksource, made it load into > pharo (1.1 las year) and built a metacello configuration because it uses > Kom. > > On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Holger Hans Peter Freyther < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> On 09/27/2011 02:01 PM, Guillermo Polito wrote: >> > A year ago I introduced SoapOpera into squeaksource... But he needs >> someone >> > to take care of it :) since I've never had time to do it. >> > >> > http://www.squeaksource.com/SoapOpera >> >> Hi, >> >> is there code to use/adopt a WSDL file? >> >> holger >> >> >
