Ok you will have to show me that again and that we remove some dust. Did you implement some distributed hash maps?
Stef > Stéf, > > P2P is what my team did in the UbiquiTalk project (2005-2009) :-) > > -Pairs discover each other dynamically. No prior config/IP setup is required, > but you need to be connected to the same network that allows multi-casting in > > -Each pair can provide 0 or more services available. A service is a piece of > code. A service has 2 parts : one that runs on the provider (can be empty) > and one that runs on the requestor. > > -Another pair can decide to use a service provided by another one => it > downloads and installs the requestor part of the service and run it. Then it > does what ever it is made for. > > The project is currently stalled. All the code is on SqueakSource though I > believe it won't run out of the box on Pharo 1.2/1.3 (too many connections to > morphic). The design needs many improvements and there are some bugs > (including one problematic due to rST). Still, we made several demos with it > including critical ones (with many CEOs and CTOs as an audience). We had > UbiquiTalk running on PDA with pocket windows... > > Noury > -- > http://twitter.com/#!/NouryBouraqadi > > > On 13 oct. 2011, at 16:57, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: > >>> Hi guys >>>> >>>> is there a library for doing P2P in Smalltalk? >>>> >>> >>> Peer to Peer in which sense? >>> >>> Data transfer? >> >> Yes >> It would be fun to see if we could replicate all the mcz files we all have >> in our caches. >> >> >> >> > > > > > Noury > -- > http://twitter.com/#!/NouryBouraqadi > > > > > >
