Please let me know if you have more problems. And let us know if you like it. Maybe others will be enticed to use it as well :)
Doru On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck < [email protected]> wrote: > Thanks guys. At least now I can use GTInspector :) > > Cheers > > > On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 9:39 AM, Alain Plantec <[email protected]>wrote: > >> I agree. >> Issue 4918 >> <http://code.google.com/p/**pharo/issues/detail?id=4918<http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=4918> >> > >> Cheers >> Alain >> >> >> >> On 19/10/2011 09:23, Tudor Girba wrote: >> >>> Hi Alain, >>> >>> I do not need it at this point. The Glamour code is fixed and relies on >>> the default behavior of PluggableTextMorph. >>> >>> But, I was simply remarking that you have an instance variable to specify >>> the styler per instance, but there is no way to set it. So, yes, I think it >>> would be a good idea to add the styler: method back :). >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Doru >>> >>> >>> >>> On 19 Oct 2011, at 09:15, Alain Plantec wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>>> If I understand well, Doru just need a PluggableTextMorph>>#styler: so >>>> that a specific styler can be directly set to an instance. >>>> We can simply add this missing method if this is the point. >>>> Cheers >>>> Alain >>>> >>>> On 19/10/2011 09:03, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Oct 19, 2011, at 8:38 AM, Tudor Girba wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks. It is fixed now by removing the explicit setting of a styler. >>>>>> >>>>>> However, I do not quite understand why not being able to set the >>>>>> styler on a per PluggableTextMorph instance basis is a good idea. You >>>>>> still >>>>>> have an instance variable for the styler, but you do not have the >>>>>> possibility to set it from the outside. You can only change the styler >>>>>> for >>>>>> the entire image by changing the StylingClass class variable. >>>>>> >>>>> I do not think but I may be wrong. Have a look at the examples of >>>>> Alain. >>>>> >>>>> Since there was not documentation at all we (ben and me) did some >>>>> mistakes and passed as idiot (as usual) >>>>> because we were so stupid not to understand the design of the code that >>>>> we do not know. >>>>> This change got waves in editor and that led lukas to complain. >>>>> >>>>> So yes documentation, classes comments is a way to make us doing less >>>>> mistakes and feeling less utterly stupid and frustrated. >>>>> But people do not get it because this is so cool to code for one self >>>>> and look so smart. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Stef >>>>> >>>>> >>>> -- >>> www.tudorgirba.com >>> >>> "Next time you see your life passing by, say 'hi' and get to know her." >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> > > > -- > Mariano > http://marianopeck.wordpress.com > > -- -- www.tudorgirba.com "Every thing has its own flow"
