let us know
because core collection should be really robust.

Stef


On Nov 1, 2011, at 9:52 AM, mail list wrote:

> I will check.  Thank you.
> 
> The problem is definitely something related to 'reachability'.  eg I can save 
> the top level objects but the second level objects (eg instance varaibles of 
> the top level) I can not get to save.
> 
> S.
> On Nov 1, 2011, at 2:59 PM, Lukas Renggli wrote:
> 
>> Not sure if this is related, but the collection hierarchy got refactored in 
>> Pharo at some point to include HashedCollection (AFAIR) as superclass. Maybe 
>> this broke something with the persistence of Sets and Dictionaries?
>> 
>> Lukas
>> 
>> On Tuesday, 1 November 2011, mail list <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > I am trying to deploy a Pharo 1.3 image using Goods and running into some 
>> > basic issues where my objects are not persisted by reachability.
>> > eg I put dictionary x at root under a key 'test'
>> > eg db root at: 'test' put x.
>> > db commit.
>> > Then at x i updated instance variable and add something to its dictionary 
>> > and committ
>> > eg x intancevariable y at: 'key' put 'zzzz'
>> > db commit
>> >
>> > looking at the root x does not get updated with y.
>> >
>> > I have the majority of the test cases pasing except for testIdentitySet 
>> > and testFlushAllRemovesAllUnreferenced.
>> >
>> > In testIdentitySet the following failure
>> > | set x y y2 |
>> >        set := KKIdentitySet database: dbOne.
>> >        x := 1@1.
>> >        y := 2@2.
>> >        set add: x.
>> >        set add: y.
>> >        self assert: (set includes: x).
>> >        self assert: (set includes: y).
>> >        self deny: (set includes: 1@1).  -->fails
>> >
>> > set = (2@2,1@1)
>> > so it seems to think that x and 1@1 are the same.  Which to me seems 
>> > correct but I may be misunderstanding the testcase.
>> >
>> > Any thoughts or pointers to update my mistakes in using Goods db would be 
>> > helpful.
>> >
>> > S.
>> > On Oct 31, 2011, at 5:49 PM, Marcus Denker wrote:
>> >
>> >> 13320
>> >> -----
>> >>
>> >> Issue 4945:   Weird Settings filtering
>> >>       http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=4945
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Marcus Denker -- http://marcusdenker.de
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> 
>> -- 
>> Lukas Renggli
>> www.lukas-renggli.ch
> 


Reply via email to