Sean P. DeNigris wrote: > Guillermo Polito wrote: > > > > Hmm, strange. There are two implementations of this method in my image. > > One in KMShortcut and one in KMNoShortcut, one does nothing (on purpose > > with a comment :P) but the other has an implementation :/... > > > I may not be understanding correctly, but they seem backwards (i.e. > NoShortcut is doing something and Shortcut is not). Although (see below)... >
Haha! You are right :). Since I introduced the concept of defaultShortcuts vs current shortcuts, that was meaningless! I only had to replace the defaultShortcut without doing any of that. Thanks! Guille, hungry of feedback :)
