Hi guido I never saw saying anything positive in this mailing-list. May be you should pay attention to you and breath a bit and try another system if pharo is so bad. You are not forced to us it. There is a VisualWorks new license or even other languages. Give a try to them, may be you will like them and do not hurt yourselves like that. Life is short and good for positive energy.
Stef On Nov 7, 2011, at 12:00 AM, Guido Stepken wrote: > >> Reading was not a problem. But I have problems to understand what I am >> supposed to understand? >> >> Norbert > > You are just coder, no software architect, right? > > Ever tried Pharo 1.3 on a older machine, e.g. P75 with 32 MBytes RAM, some > load on Seaside? Funny effects occurring... machine hangs, crashes, spends > lots of time in useless functions, unneccessarily locking resouces, memory > pumping, eating up resources while waiting for e.g. database answer, spending > increasing amount of time (up to 98%) in removing garbage .... > > It's a good way of identifying unmatured software designs. > > Colliding mental models (e.g. event driven vs. polling) > Such things happen, when all members are just coding, fixing, refactoring, > without bothering about algorithms, that still work reliable at low memory > and high load. > > Pharo at the moment is still very unreliable. > > Sorry to say that! Think about, why FreeBSD works reliably even at a load of > 50, whereas other OS stop working. > > regards, Guido Stepken
