-------- Original-Nachricht --------
Betreff: Re: [Pharo-project] TextMorph: what is the purpose of predecessor/successor?
Datum:  Fri, 11 Nov 2011 15:34:47 +0100
Von:    Johannes Rasche <[email protected]>
Antwort an:     [email protected]
An:     [email protected]



as Igor mentioned yesterday it's useful for long texts.

I would suggest, if the majority don't see the advantage of pred/succ,
to create a subclass

Johannes

Am 11.11.11 14:43, schrieb Alain Plantec:
 I forgot to say that I think we should simplify TextMorph as much as
 possible.
 I've already removed predecessor/successsor some time ago for my own
 textmorph fork.
 I open an isssue
 Alain

 Le 11/11/2011 10:38, Igor Stasenko a écrit :
 Thanks.
 Yes, i remember i seen this before, but i had no idea how it
 implemented.

 On 10 November 2011 18:36, Alain Plantec<[email protected]>
 wrote:
 Hi Igor,
 See the screenshot (Squeak 3.6).
 You can have several morphs editing the same text.
 Each morph containing its own part of the text.
 I guess predecessor ans successor are used in this context.
 Cheers

 Alain

 Le 10/11/2011 16:50, Igor Stasenko a écrit :
 looks like the purpose is to make multiple morphs, displaying
 different (but adjacent) portions of one text..

 But what i don't understand is what is the practical use of it? Is
 there an examples of such use of TextMorph(s)?
 As to me this looks a bit of over-enineering:
 morph represents a view of some model.
 Nothing prevents us from creating multiple different views of same
 model (a text in this case). And i don't get, what do we gain by
 letting them know about each other.
 If there is a need to have a coordination between views, i think it
 would be much simpler to have some centralized parent object/morph,
 which managing additional complexity related with such
 composition.


 The functionality seems to be working:
   in text morph's halo, click on its menu , and there will be
   'add predecessor'
 and
 'add successor'
 menu items, which creating a fresh text morphs over same text and put
 it in ?hand?

 i am clueless, what is purpose of this and whether it belongs to right
 place.. that's why i asking.
 (i would just throw it away ;)







Reply via email to