we will have some cases 
don't worry.

        JNIPort
        Mars?
        DBXTalk
        cairo

        
Stef
On Nov 13, 2011, at 7:07 PM, Schwab,Wilhelm K wrote:

> Sig,
> 
> The problem is that I can't release the current form for various reasons.  My 
> plan is to make (roughly) 2000 methods and 135 structure definitions 
> available, plus any other wrappers that can be separated from the grip of 
> GPL.  The tangled BLAS and GSL libraries will necessitate a wrapper library 
> of some type, but the current form needs to go on a proprietary code diet.
> 
> It's a lot of work for one-at-a-time fixes.  Callbacks will be a big step in 
> the right direction.  It would be nice to get the array types at the same 
> time.
> 
> Bill
> 
> 
> 
> ________________________________________
> From: [email protected] 
> [[email protected]] on behalf of Igor Stasenko 
> [[email protected]]
> Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2011 12:07 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] FFI wish list: double arrays and friends
> 
> On 12 November 2011 18:43, Schwab,Wilhelm K <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Sig,
>> 
>> Stef is hinting that you are going to have some good news about OpenGL and
>> FFI in general.  One area in which I have been fumbling along is arrays of
>> doubles, float, signed and unsigned single and double words.  Some of it is
>> redundant and arguably more about making code written for Dolphin happy in
>> Pharo, but the doubles really are missing.  Alignment is a concern; I have
>> been lucky.  It would be nice to get it right.
>> 
>> I (ab)use byte arrays to hold the data, have some accessors that I seldom
>> use (most of the access is, thankfully for speed, through functions in
>> external libraries).  Ideally, Pharo would provide a full range of double,
>> float, signed and unsigned single and double and probably quad words with
>> FFI awareness of all of them.
>> 
> 
> It is easy to add more types and other stuff, except that i need some
> real stuff to work with, like one you working on.
> 
> 
>> Where is all of this going?
>> 
>> My GSL interface is scarred by the past lack of support for underscores, and
>> really needs to be rebuilt now that this is no longer a problem.  It's even
>> worse with PLplot because their function names are mystifyingly cryptic;
>> Camel Case them and they are *completely* unrecognizable :(
>> 
>> Another wrinkle with GSL is that I was unable to load it (as-is) on Linux.
>> At least at the time, there were two libraries (GSL itself and BLAS) that
>> were inter-dependent.   A library that uses both would load, but the
>> individual libraries would not open via FFI.  I put a bunch of my own code,
>> and some proprietary code, into the library that allows the offenders to
>> load. With license constraints and the joys of GPL, I need to separate these
>> things before a public release.
>> 
>> It would be nice to clean all of this stuff at one shot and get first
>> releases of PLplot and GSL bindings for Pharo.  Callbacks would provide
>> clean use of the minimizers and solvers in GSL, allowing me to remove a lot
>> of confusing junk that I added to work around the missing features.  It
>> should be worth the wait.
>> 
> 
> Starting from Jan. i will focus on adding missing stuff to
> NativeBoost, like callbacks and
> code inlining. We can solve these things one by one.
> 
>> Bill
>> 
> 
> 
> --
> Best regards,
> Igor Stasenko.
> 
> 


Reply via email to